My reaction to the Netflix increase...and, catching up blog posts...

[Contact Me] | [FAQ]

[Some "Dougisms" Defined]

[About Dickens of a Blog]

[Jump to Site Links]

Summary: Netflix got called greedy and blamed for demanding people return to piracy this week when they announced their 60% price hike. I care. A lot or a little. You'll have to read to find out. Also, my plan to catch up blog posts.

BLOT: (17 Jul 2011 - 09:07:53 PM)

My reaction to the Netflix increase...and, catching up blog posts...

I have a backlog of blog posts approaching double digits. Since July began, I have had a blog post show up in my brain just about every day, and only four of them have made it "onto paper". I'll work on that. Fact is, I'm about to work on that right now. The plan is to write out five, six, or even seven blog posts; save them; and then release them into the wild about once a day—mixed in with new ones—until I have exhausted the backlog. It is a plan doomed to fail.

[This also explains why I am something like 5 days late posting about the first topic...]

To start off, let's crank up Robert Rich's A Troubled Resting Place and turn to an issue that impacts my friends more than my usual blog fare: Netflix's price increase. And to this, I will give my response, in a special blockquote, to make sure it stands out:

Meh.

While it sounds like I am in a minority, especially reading the quotes to the above linked article, which are now more Netflix positive but include such gems as, "Bye bye Netflix, what a dumb move!" and, "Dear greedy Netfilx [sic], How stupid are you?" and some stuff about people being shocked and, my favorite, a person who makes the case that by doing this Netflix is practically forcing people to pirate movies. I get it. Change sucks, especially for your average Internet user who has probably been a member of more than one group on Facebook whining about some change on the site. And price increases suck, always. Even six dollar ones (you could declare it a 60% increase, sure).

Let's play the balance game, though. The way the new scheme is set up, you can pay circa $8 for streaming, or circa $8 for unlimited, once at a time DVDs, or circa $16 for both. This replaces their $8 for one, about $10 for both scheme. Ok. I'm not losing the streaming option. This is why I am a member, the streaming. I am not losing the DVD option. If I did, then I would have six or so other options:

The point of all that was to justify my "Meh". If I only watched four or five first-run movies a month, Redbox would win. If I could mostly stick to Amazon's free-for-Prime specials with a couple (literally, two) of rentals: Amazon might win. Box stores are basically out around here. Digital cable is out. Buying movies is something I do with glee but occasionally I need an alternative. If Netflix exceeds $20 while other things stay equal, then the other options get better. If, say, it hit something like $30, then a Redbox/Amazon mix would be the way I would go. For $16? Screw it. I still save money and support the people I like.

So, for me, who is not particularly rich nor particularly apathetic to things like price increases, my answers is still..."Meh".

OTHER BLOTS THIS MONTH: July 2011


Written by Doug Bolden

For those wishing to get in touch, you can contact me in a number of ways

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

The longer, fuller version of this text can be found on my FAQ: "Can I Use Something I Found on the Site?".

"The hidden is greater than the seen."